AI Compute Futures
Building the Global Compute Commodities Market
“In 2017, I pioneered Bitcoin futures at the CFTC. I’m helping launch AI compute futures with AIC.”
Founder’s Note
The commoditization of intelligence is occurring in real time, and compute sits at the center of it. Benji and I are not first-time founders, we have done this before. But this moment is different.
In my career, I have built and sold startups, operated in regulated industries, led a publicly traded acquisition vehicle, and managed compute at scale. Benji is a deeply technical, product-focused founder with experience building one of the earliest crypto futures exchanges.
We are uniquely positioned to take on problems at the intersection of infrastructure and financial markets.
AI Compute Futures, AIC, is our next company, building a futures exchange to bring price discovery, financialization and liquidity to the global compute market.
This memo outlines how that market forms and why we will win.
Gabriel Schillinger
Co-Founder & CEO, AIC
Introduction
Compute is the defining commodity of the 21st century. Global spending on AI infrastructure is expected to exceed $500B annually by 2028, yet the market for procuring and pricing compute remains fragmented, opaque, and bilaterally negotiated. There is no standardized unit of trade, no transparent pricing benchmark, and no reliable mechanism for future delivery.

Before we dive into what AIC is building and why, a little history is required on commodities and futures, and when the breakout moments supercharge these commodities. Let’s go back to 1983, and see the various breakout moments for oil futures and energy markets.
Oil Is Financialized
Oil is financialized with the launch of crude futures on NYMEX. This gave investors and institutions the ability to hedge risk, unlock liquidity, and establish global price discovery for the world’s most important commodity.
Energy Markets Go Digital
Energy markets go digital as the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) brings trading online and global. By making markets electronic, ICE dramatically increased access, speed, and liquidity, turning energy into a global asset class.
The Financialization of Compute
The financialization of compute begins. With AIC we believe we can unlock a brand new commodity with compute, creating entirely new markets for hedging, speculation, and capital formation.
We will do this by building the infrastructure to financialize compute, by aggregating supply from data center operators, normalizing compute into standardized categories, and enabling futures contracts with physical delivery.
AIC will create the conditions for compute to be traded as a true commodity. Over time, this positions us as the central access point for compute procurement, pricing, and settlement globally.
Market Overview: Nascent
Global demand for compute is accelerating at an unprecedented pace, driven by AI, large-scale model training, and the expansion of inference across every sector.
Meeting this demand requires massive investment in data centers, GPUs, networking, and power. McKinsey estimates roughly $7T in cumulative global data center capex through 2030, forming the underlying infrastructure AIC contracts will clear against.1
Despite this scale, the compute market remains structurally broken. Capacity is concentrated, pricing is opaque, and access is constrained. There is no unified mechanism for price discovery, nor an efficient way to hedge, trade, or gain exposure to compute.
In every prior commodity cycle, once a resource reaches sufficient scale and strategic importance, financial markets emerge around it. Oil, power, and metals all followed this path, evolving into deeply liquid markets where derivatives volumes exceed the underlying tens of times over.
Compute is now reaching that moment.
AIC is built for this transition, introducing the financial layer that enables price discovery, liquidity, and risk transfer, transforming compute from a constrained resource into a tradable asset class, and unlocking a market that scales to many multiples of the underlying infrastructure.
Futures, Simplified
Futures unlock the financial layer, allowing participants to hedge risk, and trade exposure to an asset without owning it.
Units of the commodity can be shorted without owning the underlying and as long as it’s closed before delivery it is cash settled. This means that the commodity’s financial activity can grow far beyond its physical supply.
Applied to compute, this means GPU capacity and compute resources can be priced, hedged, and traded like any other commodity, transforming a constrained infrastructure market into a liquid financial one.
AIC’s Market Size: The Commodity-to-Derivative Multiplier
In mature commodity markets, financial volume scales to tens of multiples of the underlying physical supply. If deliverable compute reaches $1T annually by 2030 under central demand scenarios, applying conservative commodity-market multipliers implies a futures complex in the $10–25T annual notional range.
Size the 2030 deliverable compute market
Drag to stress the model. Composite revenue stacks three streams settlement, data, and trading at the rates set in Memo.
The key insight is that liquidity does not require widespread physical delivery, it requires credible physical delivery. The ability to settle against the real world provides true price discovery and financialization.
| Commodity Complex | Annual Physical ($T) | Annual Futures Notional ($T) | Multiplier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude oil | ~3.0 | ~tens of trillions | ~10–20× |
| Natural gas | ~0.8 | ~multi-trillion | ~10–20× |
| Gold | ~0.2 | ~multi-trillion | ~20×+ |
| Compute at maturity (implied) | ~1.0 | 10–25 | 10–25× |
Why Now: What Drives Financialization
Commodity markets financialize when producers and consumers need to hedge.
Compute is now at that point: multi-billion-dollar infrastructure, multi-year deployment cycles, supply bottlenecks in power and interconnection, and buyers committing hundreds of billions, soon to trillions, against uncertain future pricing.
At the same time, demand is accelerating rapidly with the rise of AI, while supply remains constrained by physical infrastructure. This combination of scale, capital intensity, and price uncertainty is what has historically triggered the emergence of futures markets.
The conditions are already here. AIC is built for this moment, applying financial market structure, standardization, and clearing to a market that has reached the threshold but lacks the mechanism to scale.
Precedent: How New Benchmarks Actually Scale
Successful industry standard contracts often look niche at launch and obvious in retrospect. West Texas Intermediate (WTI), now the dominant U.S. oil benchmark, achieved that position only after physical delivery standards, market depth, and hedging behavior.
The same pattern emerges whenever a fragmented physical market becomes standardized and centrally priced.
The launch environment for AIC is much more favorable than the past. The underlying market already exists at scale, hyperscalers are investing hundreds of billions in capacity, NVIDIA’s data center business has reached massive scale, and enterprises are committing significant budgets to AI workloads. Taken together, this represents one of the largest coordinated infrastructure buildouts in human history, on par with the interstate highway system and the Apollo program combined.
Yet pricing remains fragmented and opaque, unlike other tradeable commodities that developed efficient multi-sided markets.
The Players: Multi-Sided Market
AIC is a multi-sided market connecting supply, demand, and financial participants.
On the supply side are data centers, GPU clouds, and infrastructure providers seeking better utilization, forward demand visibility and financing. On the demand side are AI labs, enterprises, and model builders that need reliable access to compute at predictable terms. A third group, market makers, speculators, and other financial participants, provides liquidity and enables risk transfer.
Each participant already exists and faces a clear constraint: fragmented access, opaque pricing, and no mechanism to hedge or trade exposure. AIC brings these participants into a single, standardized market.
AIC Platform & Technology
The AIC platform is built as a vertically integrated system combining a derivatives exchange, a clearing interface, and a physical compute delivery network.
AIC Margined Market
A fully margined, less than 28 day market, that is physically settled with a central limit order book, real-time margining, and standardized contracts tied to GPU hardware and a normalized compute unit.
AIC CFTC Licensed Exchange
Expansion into a regulated futures exchange with full forward pricing, integrated clearing, and institutional participation.
Grand Central
A unified delivery layer that delivers compute in an agreed upon standardized unit of work to contract holders, enabling compute to be delivered as a commodity.
AIC’s product and technical architecture establish the system for pricing, trading, and delivering compute. Full technical architecture is included in the appendix.
204 Days: The Regulatory Pathway Precedent
AIC is designed to follow a staged path from initial market launch to full regulatory designation.
In February 2026, Xchange Alpha secured CFTC designation as a Designated Contract Market (DCM) in just 204 days, the fastest approval on record.19 This shows that exchange licensing can move quickly when built on credible systems, strong preparation, and alignment with established regulatory frameworks.
We will initially launch under existing short-term contract exemptions with a physically settled, margined market, and transition to a fully regulated exchange upon CFTC designation, establishing AIC as an institutionally recognized venue.
Go-to-Market Strategy
AIC’s go-to-market begins by solving a hard operational problem for real buyers: securing trusted compute from fragmented suppliers. Rather than launching an exchange and waiting for liquidity, we will build the market on top of real usage. Drawing on deep experience in developing highly liquid futures markets, AIC follows a structured path:
Aggregation
Buyer acquisition is driven through founder-led sales and integration with AI labs, startups, and enterprises, embedding AIC into procurement workflows to deliver fast, reliable access to reserved compute capacity.
Supply Formation
AIC onboards a curated set of GPU clouds and data center operators, prioritizing high-demand clusters (e.g., H100/H200) with standardized inventory and enforced performance.
Delivery
Workloads are provisioned and routed across integrated suppliers through AIC’s delivery layer, which manages allocation, orchestration, and verification. Telemetry and SLAs enforce performance, forming the foundation of Grand Central.
Pricing
Pricing and market data are published based on real transaction activity, establishing AIC as the reference point for compute pricing.
Market Formation
Standardized futures products are introduced once sufficient demand, supply, and data are established, alongside the onboarding of market makers and financial participants.
Market Participants
AIC will develop its market by onboarding participants in parallel, with each group engaged through tailored entry points.
Buyers
AI labs, model builders, and enterprise teams already face fragmented supply, uncertain availability, and limited cost visibility. They are engaged through direct sales and integration into procurement workflows, providing reliable access to compute, improved pricing transparency, and trusted execution.
Sellers
Data centers and GPU providers are onboarded through a curated process that prioritizes quality and reliability. AIC offers a new demand channel, improved utilization, and the ability to hedge future offtake, establishing confidence in delivery from the outset.
Financial Participants
Market makers and traders are introduced as the market develops sufficient depth in demand, supply, and transaction data. Their participation enables liquidity provision, price discovery, and risk transfer.
Business Model
Trading & Clearing
Transaction and clearing fees from futures markets are high-margin, volume-driven, and scale with liquidity. CME generated $6.52B in revenue in 2025, supported by record average daily volume of 28.1M contracts and a 64.9% operating margin.
Market Data & Benchmarks
In mature exchange businesses pricing data sets, reference rates, and analytics are some of the most valuable revenue streams. At ICE, Fixed Income & Data Services generated $2.3B in revenue, representing roughly a quarter of the business, while at LSEG, Data & Analytics accounted for 43% of total income with high margins.
Settlement & Delivery Infrastructure
This is where compute is actually delivered into real workloads. It behaves more like neutral infrastructure than a traditional exchange. Equinix generated $9.217B in revenue in 2025 with a 49% adjusted EBITDA margin, providing a strong analog with the exception that we see a future where trillions of dollars of compute will flow through this infrastructure.
Team
AIC is led by founders operating at the intersection of large-scale compute infrastructure and financial market design.
| Gabriel Schillinger | Co-Founder & CEO | Two-time exited founder, most recent company acquired by Animoca. Deep experience operating large-scale compute networks, including prior management of over 500,000 GPUs. Background in regulated industries, with major partnerships including Walmart, Target, MCX, and Razer, and experience raising capital across private and public markets. |
| Benji Richards | Co-Founder & CTO | Co-founder of Futureswap, the first decentralized perpetual futures exchanges, which processed billions in trading volume. Deep expertise in derivatives design, exchange architecture, and financial engineering. |
| J. Christopher Giancarlo | Advisor | Former Chairman of the CFTC. Advises on regulatory strategy and DCM pathway, with direct experience shaping the framework for Bitcoin futures. |
| Christian Berry | Advisor | Former quantitative strategist at Bridgewater and Goldman Sachs. Advises on market microstructure, pricing models, and institutional product design. |
Competitive Landscape
The compute market today resembles many commodities before their financialization: fragmented, brokered, and lacking standardized contracts, centralized clearing, and true price discovery.
Current participants fall into four categories but none create a true futures market:
| Platform | Model | How it works | Key limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compute.Exchange & Silicon Data | Asset-light brokerage | Manual RFQ workflow. Buyers submit specifications and the team manually sources data center quotes. Upon quote acceptance, the buyer is introduced to the data center by email. | No price transparency, no continuous order book, and no clearing mechanism. |
| SF Compute | Inventory-heavy bare-metal reseller | Takes principal balance-sheet risk on three- to five-year hardware leases and repackages capacity into fixed-hour blocks. Relies on posted prices for a narrow SKU set. | Not true exchange infrastructure. Limited price discovery and liquidity. |
| Andromeda | GPU rental marketplace | Aggregates providers behind unified billing and high-volume marketplace workflows. | Functions more like an OTC desk than a centralized trading venue. |
| Hydra Host | Index-referenced, cash-settled venue | Early-stage attempt to build a venue around index-linked, cash-settled contracts. Currently pre-launch. | Index-based trading does not create a true underlying market or directly influence physical market price formation. |
| AIC | Full-stack, physically and cash-settled compute futures exchange | Combines market-setting physical delivery with a central limit order book, enabling continuous, transparent, on-screen price discovery. | Built to financialize compute through efficient markets rather than replicate brokerage, resale, or synthetic index exposure. |
By combining standardized contracts, a central limit order book, and physical delivery, AIC enables real price discovery in a market that is currently opaque. Physical settlement unlocks true price discovery via an efficient market while simultaneously offering the ability for cash settlement.
The Round
This round enables AIC to build the final layer of the market: making compute tradeable, deliverable, and financialized.
Capital will be deployed across core product and infrastructure, team expansion, regulatory execution, and early supply and demand. The objective is to build the product and gain DCM designation.
The Market Ahead
Compute is becoming humanity’s foundational commodity, but an efficient market around it has not yet formed. Pricing is opaque, access is fragmented, and there is no standardized mechanism for forward delivery or risk transfer.
AIC builds the missing layer. By combining physical delivery, standardized contracts, and centralized market structure, it enables compute to be priced, traded, and settled like every other critical commodity.
We understand how to scale systems, operate in regulated environments, and bring new market structures into existence. But this moment is different and is happening now. The shift underway is redefining how intelligence itself is created and deployed, and compute sits at the center of it.
AIC participates in the growth of AI, by defining the system through which compute is accessed, priced, and traded.
Contact: GS@AIComputeFutures.com
Appendix
Market Sizing & Industry Data
The data center market is already operating at global infrastructure scale. McKinsey projects approximately $6.7T of cumulative data center capex through 2030, with AI as the primary driver. Compute is no longer just a software input—it is a capital-intensive, power-constrained, physically delivered industrial input.
The International Energy Agency projects global data center electricity demand to reach ~945 TWh by 2030, roughly equivalent to Japan’s current annual consumption. At the same time, NVIDIA’s Data Center segment reached $193.7B in FY2026, the clearest public proxy for monetized AI compute demand.
Commodity markets emerge around large physical systems with long lead times and volatile forward pricing. Compute now exhibits those characteristics.
In mature commodity markets, financial activity scales to multiples of the underlying. Oil, natural gas, and gold futures routinely trade at 10–20× the physical market. Applying similar dynamics, a ~$1T annual compute market implies a $10–25T annual futures complex at maturity.
Business Model and Comps
The True Moat: Settlement & Delivery Infrastructure
Compute futures settle into GPU-hours executing on real infrastructure. AIC operates the delivery layer that routes and verifies this compute.
This includes provisioning, routing, telemetry, SLA enforcement, and settlement. Every integration, payment, verification, and orchestration, becomes a distribution node within the network.
This layer behaves economically like cloud infrastructure, not an exchange. Equinix reported 49% EBITDA margins on $9.2B of revenue, while AWS operates at 35%+ operating margins at scale.
At 20–30% routing share on a $1T compute market, even a 50–100 bps take rate generates $1B–3B in high-margin infrastructure revenue.
More importantly, this layer drives multiple expansion. Exchanges trade at 12–17× EV/EBITDA, while infrastructure platforms trade at 22–27×. Owning compute settlement places AIC into the infrastructure category.
The Annuity: Market Data & Benchmark Licensing
Every transaction generates pricing data. In mature exchanges, this becomes the most valuable revenue stream.
ICE generates ~$2.4B in data revenue at ~45% margins. LSEG derives ~43% of revenue from Data & Analytics. Bloomberg generates ~$13B annually from terminal subscriptions.
AIC’s Compute Reference Rate and underlying tick data become the source of truth for priced compute. Market participants cannot replicate this dataset—they must subscribe.
At scale, this supports $600M+ ARR within five years and $1.5–2.5B at maturity, at 40%+ margins.
The Flywheel: Trading & Clearing
Transaction and clearing fees scale with volume but are not the primary value driver.
At maturity, a $10T–25T futures market implies $500M–$1.0B in annual fee revenue. This alone supports a large standalone business.
However, the strategic role of trading is to generate data (for stream 2) and settlement volume (for stream 1). Fees compress over time; volume compounds.
The Valuation Stack
AIC is not a single business—it is actually three layered on one commodity: infrastructure (settlement & delivery), data (benchmarks & analytics), and exchange (trading & clearing).
Streams 2 and 3 alone support ICE-scale valuation (~$100B). The settlement layer adds another $100B+ through infrastructure multiples and direct revenue.
| Stream | Annual revenue | Margin | Reference comp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trading & clearing fees | $0.5–1.0B | 60–70% | CME · CBOE (12–17×) |
| Market data & benchmark feed | $1.5–2.5B | 40–55% | ICE Data · LSEG (17–22×) |
| Physical settlement & delivery | $1.0–3.0B | 55–70% | Equinix · DLR (22–27×) |
| Composite at steady state | $4.0–7.0B | ~55% blended | $150–250B EV |
The result is a structurally larger business than any single listed exchange. AIC is not an exchange with a data business—it is infrastructure with an exchange attached.
Product & Technical Architecture
AIC is a vertically integrated system combining a derivatives exchange, a clearing interface, and a physical delivery network.
Phase 1: Exempt Market
A physically settled, margined market operating under the 28-day forward exemption.
Exchange and Matching Engine
The exchange operates a deterministic central limit order book with strict price-time priority. Given the expected trade profile, the system prioritizes correctness, determinism, and uptime over ultra-low latency.
- In-memory matching engine with deterministic execution
- Event-sourced ledger for all order and trade state
- Real-time market data distribution
- Redundant order gateways with API and institutional connectivity
This infrastructure builds directly on the team’s prior work at Futureswap, including offchain order routing and high-throughput derivatives infrastructure. That system processed thousands of orders per second and maintained 100% uptime over multiple years through deliberate redundancy and failover design.
Margining, Risk, and Liquidation
All contracts in Phase 1 are margined. The system supports differentiated margining by participant classification:
- Hedgers receive preferential margin treatment
- Speculators are subject to higher initial and maintenance requirements
Risk infrastructure includes:
- Real-time portfolio margining and position netting
- Continuous mark-to-market and variation margin
- Automated margin call framework
Liquidation follows a two-stage model: partial liquidation reduces positions as margin deteriorates, then full liquidation is triggered if thresholds continue to be breached. For large positions, liquidation is executed via auction-style mechanisms to minimize market impact.
Contract Design and Standardization
Initial contracts include:
- NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB VRAM
- NVIDIA H200 SXM5 141GB VRAM
In parallel, AIC introduces the Standardized Compute Unit (SCU), defined using MLPerf-class benchmarks. Hardware-specific contracts anchor early liquidity, while the SCU establishes a path toward fungibility and long-term financialization.
Physical Settlement and Delivery
At contract expiry:
- Positions are mapped to delivery obligations
- Supplier capacity is allocated
- Buyers receive provisioned compute access
- Telemetry verifies uptime, throughput, and execution
Delivery is governed by strict SLAs with meaningful financial penalties for violations. Margin serves as the primary protection mechanism; only in cases of full default does the partnered clearinghouse’s insurance framework apply.
Phase 2: Licensed Exchange (DCM)
Upon obtaining DCM designation, AIC expands to support the full forward curve while integrating regulated exchange infrastructure.
Connamara Systems provides:
- Exchange-grade infrastructure components
- Market surveillance and regulatory tooling
- Reporting and audit systems required for CFTC compliance
- Institutional connectivity, including FIX integration
AIC integrates with an external derivatives clearing organization rather than internalizing clearing, providing central counterparty risk management, default handling, and insurance-backed protection.
Phase 3: Grand Central
Grand Central is the system that transforms fragmented compute infrastructure into a unified, deliverable commodity. It operates as an active control plane, not a passive registry.
Grand Central consists of four primary subsystems:
- Supplier Integration Layer. Adapters and APIs that interface with heterogeneous data center environments
- Benchmarking and Standardization. Continuous MLPerf-based benchmarking that maps hardware into SCUs
- Routing Engine. Dynamic allocation of workloads based on contract obligations and system constraints
- Verification and SLA Enforcement. Real-time telemetry ingestion, validation, and automated detection of SLA violations
Grand Central enforces strict SLAs with meaningful economic consequences. Routine failures are absorbed through margin and penalties; severe failures escalate to clearinghouse protection mechanisms. This layered model ensures that delivery risk is measurable, enforceable, and financially contained.
Detailed Regulatory Pathway
AIC will launch under existing exemptions with a physically settled, margined market.
This enables:
- early revenue
- real transaction data
- operational validation
In parallel, AIC will pursue DCM designation.
Xchange Alpha secured DCM approval in 204 days, the fastest on record, demonstrating that approval can move quickly with the right preparation and advisors.
AIC’s phased approach reduces regulatory risk by:
- generating traction before licensure
- aligning system design with regulatory expectations
- leveraging experienced advisors and infrastructure partners
Key Risks & Mitigants
| Risk | Description | Mitigant |
|---|---|---|
| Standardization Risk | Compute may be harder to normalize across providers than anticipated. | AIC starts with two well-defined categories (training and inference) and controls the abstraction layer. The team’s operational experience managing 500K+ GPUs de-risks this. |
| Liquidity Risk | Futures markets may not develop sufficient trading activity early on. | AIC’s Phase 1 strategy targets real procurement demand (not speculative volume), building liquidity from actual usage before expanding to financial participants. |
| Regulatory Risk | DCM approval may take longer than expected or face new hurdles. | The Phase 1 futures contract exclusion allows AIC to operate and generate revenue without a DCM license. The advisory relationship with former CFTC Chairman Giancarlo provides a significant strategic advantage. |
Sources and footnotes
- McKinsey & Company, “The cost of compute: A $7 trillion race to scale data centers,” Apr 2025. Base case $6.7T cumulative 2025–30.
- CY2025 hyperscaler actuals and 2026 guidance from Q4 2025 earnings calls and 10-Ks filed Jan–Feb 2026.
- NVIDIA 10-K, FY2026. Data Center segment revenue $193.7B FY26; Q4 FY26 DC revenue $62.3B.
- IEA, “Energy and AI,” April 2025; base case 945 TWh by 2030.
- Goldman Sachs Research (2025 update), U.S. data-center demand +50% to 92 GW by 2027.
- ICE, “Why the world needs benchmarks” and EIA, “Physical Market Conditions, Paper Market Activity,” Nov 2012.
- Tang, K. & Xiong, W. (2012), “Index Investment and the Financialization of Commodities,” Financial Analysts Journal 68(6).
- CME Group, “Delivery of WTI Futures” (educational).
- CME Group, “The 40-Year Story of a Crude Oil Benchmark,” OpenMarkets 2023; ICE 2025 annual release: record Brent F&O 383.6M contracts.
- CME Group 2025 10-K: revenue $6.52B, op. margin 64.9%, ADV 28.1M. ICE FY2025: $9.9B net revenue. CBOE FY2025: $2.43B net revenue, 67.7% adj. EBITDA margin.
- Equinix FY2025 Annual Report (adjusted EBITDA margin 49% on $9.22B revenue). NVIDIA FY2026 10-K (non-GAAP gross margin ~73–75%). Amazon FY2025 10-K (AWS operating margin 35.4%).
- Bloomberg Terminal subscriber count (~325,000) per Burton-Taylor. Total global financial market-data spend ~$40–45B.
- Grand View Research, AI Infrastructure Market Size, Share & Growth Report, 2030.
- Global Market Insights, GPU as a Service Market Size & Share | Growth Forecast 2032.
- Deloitte Insights, AI infrastructure gaps.
- CFTC, Economic Purpose of Futures Markets and How They Work.
- Compute Exchange homepage.
- AI Compute Futures, futures exchange for AI compute.
- Milbank, Milbank Advises Xchange Alpha on Fastest Ever CFTC Designation as a Contract Market.
- ICE / Energy Intelligence, Evolution of Brent, Its Markets and Why Its Ecosystem is Relied Upon by Commercial Participants.
- ICE Investor Relations, Jeffrey Sprecher — Founder, Chair and CEO.
- SF Compute, company website. Inventory-heavy bare-metal reseller.
- SiliconANGLE, Demand GPU startup Andromeda raises funding at $1.5B valuation, Mar 18 2026.
- Hydra Host, funding profile via Exa. Early-stage, pre-launch attempt at an index-referenced, cash-settled compute venue.
